Tue22052012

Back Columnists Coffee Break We had food, yet four million died
12 Feb 2012

We had food, yet four million died

Author:  Kanchan Gupta

Made-in-Britain Bengal famine of 1943

In his film Ashani Sanket (Distant Thunder), listed by The New York Times as one of the ‘Best 1,000 Films Ever Made’, Satyajit Ray brought alive, with great sensitivity, the misery inflicted by the horrific Bengal famine of 1943.

The film was made three decades after that harrowing experience which returned to haunt Bengalis during the mid-1960s and became the leitmotif of the Communist movement in West Bengal. Based on Bibhutibhushan Bandyopadhyay’s novel of the same name, Ray’s award-winning film suggested, without recourse to crudity, how hunger stalked people amidst plentiful food stocks. Neither Bandyopadhyay nor Ray was treading new ground in making this point. After all, the famine of 1943 was a man-made disaster that claimed four million lives as the colonial British Government chose to ignore its horrendous consequences.

The Bengal famine of 1943 — there were famines earlier, too, but none so devastating — has been evocatively described as the ‘forgotten holocaust’, a crime not recognised by history and now no more than a fading memory in the Bengali conscience. Hence the need to recall the sequence of events that led to hunger, disease and death on an unimaginable scale in rural Bengal where people pleaded for a fistful of rice but were spurned by a callous administration and corrupt hoarders — both joined hands to zealously guard overflowing godowns where food was stocked to feed British troops.

The distant thunder in Ashani Sanket referred to Japanese bombers. In real life, it was the killer cyclone of October 1942 which destroyed paddy fields along the east coast stretching from Bengal to Odisha. With no autumnal harvest, farmers, most of them landless or marginal, had no other option but to dip into emergency stocks at home which ran out by the summer of 1943. Meanwhile, sensing a scarcity, traders began to hoard whatever they could lay their hands on.

But the cyclone was only one of the contributing factors and its impact could have been mitigated if the colonial administration had not acted in the most selfish manner. Huge quantities of rice were stockpiled for British soldiers by seizing paddy meant for civilian consumption. Worse, even as the stark contours of the famine were emerging, rice was being exported to Sri Lanka for British soldiers garrisoned there. The natives could die, but the Tommies had to be fed.

Later, much after vultures had feasted on the dead and the dying, Britain tried to explain the crippling shortage by citing the suspension of rice imports from Burma, then occupied by Japanese forces. But Burmese rice, at best, accounted for not more than 15 per cent of Bengal’s requirement. In any event, every effort was made to mop up all available rice from rural Bengal and either store it for soldiers or ship it out to what was then Ceylon. The little that escaped British appropriation was picked up by traders, nearly all of them collaborators of the civil administration, and sold at exorbitant prices. Wartime Kolkata, flush with money, did not experience the hunger of rural Bengal; tragically, Bengalis who could afford to buy rice at black market rates were deaf to the pitiful cries of starving fellow Bengalis who roamed the streets begging for no more than a morsel of food. The sight of emaciated children, many no more than infants, on the verge of death did not move hearts. In many ways, it was Bengal’s darkest moment. Latter day economists would say that market forces decided the price of rice. It would, therefore, be incorrect to blame the colonial Government alone for the colossal loss of lives.

Winston Churchill, who refused to acknowledge the famine till it became an embarrassment for the Empire, was to later slyly pretend it never happened by glossing over this bleak chapter of British rule in India in his six-volume History of the Second World War. Disdainful of India’s unwashed Hindoos and remorselessly untouched by their sufferings, he claimed, “No great portion of the world population was so effectively protected from the horrors and perils of the World War as were the people of Hindustan. They were carried through the struggle on the shoulders of our small island.” The lives of four million people who perished in the made-in-Britain famine of 1943 were inconsequential for the Empire’s last standard-bearer.

It is unthinkable that so many lives would be lost today even in the worst possible circumstances. In food surplus India, Government often claims, there are enough provisions to ensure that nobody dies of starvation. No matter how scary the distant thunder may be, rest assured you shall not go hungry. Indeed, despite the appalling poverty that still stalks a vast number of people in this country, rarely if ever anybody dies of starvation.

Two things have changed since 1943. The first is the attitude of the poor — they are no longer willing to go down meekly and without a fight. In 1943, the famished masses surrendered to their fate. There was no struggle for survival: Godowns were not raided by hungry masses, traders were not attacked, administration offices were not set on fire. Today, such unquestioning surrender can be ruled out. There will be food riots in the streets and villages will go up in flames if there is a famine and the poor are left to die of starvation. We may not acknowledge this reality, but deep within the elite — those who have come to substitute the colonial Government — know that nothing can save them from mob fury.

Second, and this is perhaps more important, as a people we are possibly more caring today than we were in 1943. In the shortage years of the 1960s and 1970s, when enough food never seemed to be available, my mother recalls how Punjab would take care to send rice to West Bengal. I doubt if any Indian today would turn his or her face away on spotting a starving man, woman or child. Our relative prosperity has made us more humane by affording us the opportunity to give. Yet, two questions remain: Are we giving enough? And are we willing to share our prosperity with the less fortunate?

This article was prompted by the chance discovery of a clutch of photographs of the 1943 Bengal famine that forms part of Life magazine’s awesome archive. One of them is reproduced here.

Follow the writer on: http://twitter.com/KanchanGupta. Blog on this and other issues at http://kanchangupta.blogspot.com. Write to him at  This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it

Last modified on Saturday, 11 February 2012 21:50
Kanchan Gupta

Kanchan Gupta



Kanchan Gupta shepherds diverse opinion and analysis on the Editorial and Opeditorial pages of The Pioneer. During a break from journalism he served in the PMO as an aide to Atal Bihari Vajpayee and as Director of Maulana Azad Centre in Cairo. His blog, Agent Provocateur, reflects his political views. Among the blogs he keenly follows is Usual Suspects. His Twitter handle is twitter.com/KanchanGupta

Website: kanchangupta.blogspot.com

11 Comments

  • Comment Link Krishan in California 20 February 2012 posted by Krishan in California

    Thank you for this article that reminds us what a difference it makes to be free than be enslaved. True, harvests have sometimes failed in parts of India and there was scarcity of food, sometimes acute scarcity, before the "Green Revolution," but there has been no mass starvation in free India. Contrary to popular belief about the “civilized” British - mostly created by Mr. Nehru's keeping Lord Mountbatten on the job after independence - India was not given independence on a platter. It was fought and paid for by Indian blood and sacrifice. And no repeat of 1943-type Great Famine, anywhere in India, is among the gifts to the country from the patriots who fought for India's freedom.

  • Comment Link Rangaesh Gadasalli 20 February 2012 posted by Rangaesh Gadasalli

    Dear Kanchanji, yes,we have come a long way indeed.During my last trip to India, I saw trucks from Karekrishan temple in Bengaluru carrying good food to 250,000 students in the city. I felt happy to visit the temple and praise all . By the way is it not the neglect of the hungry and needy in villages that lead to the fall of the NDA govt? we had millions of food rotting in godowns and we were busy singing India shining songs on TV,lap tops and what not.

  • Comment Link Jitendra Desai 13 February 2012 posted by Jitendra Desai

    As people we have become more caring.Poltical class? Babus? we could appear more callous than Churchill, as we have ENOUGH food and yet we have issues of poverty if not starvation.We are bogged down by the politics of poverty.Look at PDS,Food Security bill,MNERGA ......look at corruption and callousness of our own people , who siphon off 40% of subsidised kerosene in black market.Those who buy it are aware that it is meant for our poor mothers to cook her meals.
    Look at those diesel driven SUVs and luxury sedans.Are we not aware that this fuel is subsidised for tractors, trucks and farmers.We have automakers announcing so many diesel driven car models every few months.We can't blame all this on Churchills any more.

  • Comment Link Atma Gandhi 13 February 2012 posted by Atma Gandhi

    Effluents to are no less selfish than in past. Basic Food may reach Poor but other things have been snatched from POOR as well as Lower middle Class who have been reduced to live like POOR in all but NAME. Look at Planning Commission yardstick of poverty- RS 32/- & Rs 26/- per person in urban & Rural Area . Need We say More??

  • Comment Link kaushal 12 February 2012 posted by kaushal

    @Meraj
    You are dumb and idiot.

  • Comment Link kaushal 12 February 2012 posted by kaushal

    @Meraj
    You are a dumb and idiot.

  • Comment Link Ajith Kumar 12 February 2012 posted by Ajith Kumar

    Is there NO possibility of taking the issue of hunger,starvation and malnutrition of Millions of Indians to
    the Supreme Court treating this as an Impending National
    Calamity and SHAME.
    This Gvt.led by the Economist Politician surreounded by SENSEX DIVEN Ministers as wel as a Minister spending his
    time playing Politics in the Cricket Arena WILL BE WORSE
    than the British.At least they DID NOT ASK the people to vote
    them in to power So That the Voters can be shown gratitude
    for keeping them starved.In the last 15 years the Divide between the haves and have nots widened as if India was hit by a massive Earth Quake.The P.M of the Nation had the
    audacity to EXPRESS his anguish because he and the rulers
    before him COULD NOT alleviate the misery of the people
    in which the Most Vulnerable of them ALL-CHILDREN suffer
    permanantly debilitating malnutrition in their infancy.
    WE DO NOT CARE AS WE ARE BUSY WATCHING THE
    ËSCAPE"routes of Cricket and Vulgar Expression of affluence by the RICH

  • Comment Link Arackal Narayanan 12 February 2012 posted by Arackal Narayanan

    The Thinder is not far off for millions of Indians.
    Utter,callousness,sadistic attitudes and Rank Inefficiency
    among the Govt is WAITING for terrific disasters.
    We hve a Food Minister batting for his Rich Farmers flatly
    Refusing even a Supreme Court advisory that istead of allowing thousands of tons of food rotting in open yards etcgive them to the starving milions.He is challenging(even
    though a semi prepared agenda to SHOW that Congress cares)the Right to Fod project initiated by the Congress President.
    We have farmers committing suicide because the harvested
    crop have no buyers-in Bengal.The Populism of the C.M has
    died down.The millions who are suffering from semi starvation and starvation as well as children suffering from
    maanutrition due to in adequate food ARE LIVING examples of the ARROGANCE AND INEFFICIENCY COMBINED WITH
    CYNICISM SHOWN BY THE RULING CLASS

  • Comment Link meraj 12 February 2012 posted by meraj

    And yet Kanchan Gupta would still holiday in London...double standards

  • Comment Link Niladrinath Mohanty 12 February 2012 posted by Niladrinath Mohanty

    There was another famine greater than 1943 Bengal famine- that was 1866 na anka famine in Odisha in the ninth year of reign of Puri Gajapati King ( hence the name na anka) which destroyed the pride and self respect of proud Odia people. This famine was also due to callousness of the the then British rulers.

Leave a comment

Make sure you enter the (*) required information where indicated.
Basic HTML code is allowed.