- State Editions
- A YEAR OF FEATS
- Cover Story
- 150th Anniversary Issue
- Middle India
- Literary Issue Special
- Cinema Issue Special
- Women's Special Issue
- Foreign Policy Special Issue
- for a cause
Maharaj Kumar Udai Prakash of Sirmaur (Himachal Pradesh) and his wife, Rasika Prakash, at “Sirmaur House” in the Doon valley, are visibly disturbed. And they have reason to be so.
Rajmata Padmini Devi of Jaipur has decided to hold the “installation ceremony” of her nine-year-old grandson at the palace in Nahan in Himachal Pradesh on May 15. She held a small “tikka” ceremony at Jaipur’s city palace on April 13 where the paternal Gotra of Lakshya Raj Singh was changed from “Manav” to “Attri” of the Sirmaur Royals.
The event was performed in the presence of three former Sirmaur nobles — Arak Singh, Ajay Bahadur Singh and Abhay Bahadur Singh. Lakshya is the younger son of Diya Kumari, the only child of Jaipur’s last maharaja late Brigadier Bhawani Singh and Padmini Devi.
This has come as a shock to Udai Prakash as he has been the Sirmaur heir for the past forty eight years. Talking exclusively to The Pioneer at ‘Sirmaur House’ in the Doon valley this morning, he said he would like to question Rajmata Padmini Devi’s sudden interest in the Sirmaur and Nahan family. “Ever since her marriage in 1966 into the Jaipur Royal Family, she has neglected her part of the Nahan Palace and has brought it to a state of ruin. She has barely visited Nahan four or five times in the past four decades,” he says.
He said that in the past 30 years, she had jointly contested nine along with him) a number of cases pertaining to the property of the Late Maharaja of Sirmaur, where she had admitted Udai Prakash as the adopted son of late Maharaja Rajendra Prakash, both in courts as well as outside. “She was with me against all adversaries and now those adversaries have gone over to her side and are supporting her in her bid to declare her grandson the crown prince of Nahan. She cannot legally adopt a second grandson as she has already adopted Padmanabh Singh, Lakshya’s elder brother.”
Rajendra Prakash, the last Raja of Sirmaur, died in 1964. He did not have a male heir. He had two wives, Durga Devi and Indira Devi. Padmini Devi is the daughter of Indira Devi whereas Udai Prakash is the son of Durga Devi’s daughter Nalini. Udai Prakash was adopted in 1965 by Durga Devi as the heir to Rajendra Prakash’s property. Padmini Devi has only one daughter, Diya, whose elder son Padmanabh (14 years old) succeeded Bhawani Singh of Jaipur after being legally adopted by him in 2002. Padmanabh was made titular maharaja of Jaipur upon his grandfather’s demise in 2011.
Lakshya’s “installion” at Sirmaur is complicated because he is getting there through Padmini Devi, his maternal grandmother and daughter of the last ruling Maharaja of Sirmaur, Rajendra Prakash, who died without a male successor in 1964.
Fifty-eight year old Udai Prakash says he was legally adopted by his “Naani” (maternal grandmother) and he has the first right to Sirmaur. “The ministry of law, Government of India, examined the case and recommended my recognition as the successor to the late Maharaja of Sirmaur. The same view was endorsed by then home minister Government of India Asok Sen.”
Since long Udai Prakash has been actively restoring the Nahan palace, (which was in neglect since the death of the late Maharaja), celebrating the birthday of the late Maharaja and restoring the Khedeke Maharaj temple.
“How can she declare her grandson as the successor to her father? According to Hindu law and customs a daughter cannot declare a successor to her father once she is married into another family. She can do so in regard to her own property and family, that is Jaipur alone,” he says.
The fight is for titles which are a thing of the past. These titles have a lot of respect still attached to them. They are still prestigious.
Padmini Devi and Udai Prakash signed a legal settlement in 2011 to apportion the Sirmaur estate that includes the royal palace and a villa in Nahan, many acres of agricultural land and property in Dehradun. All disputes were settled and things were fine. “And then, all of a sudden, she has decided to place her grandson as a successor to Sirmaur,” says a puzzled Udai Prakash.
It now remains to be seen what turn things will take. May 15 is round the corner. The Royal Palace in Nahan, which has been divided between Padmini Devi and Udai Prakash, will be the focus of all attention.
Will Sirmaur have a crown prince from Jaipur?
MORE State Editions NEWS
- BJD against BJD in Joda, Keonjhar civic bodies 25 Nov 2015 | MALAY MOHAPATRA | in Ranchi
- Stone laid for Jagannath shrine in Bangalore 25 Nov 2015 | PNS | in Bhubaneswar
- 15 squads to prevent poaching in B’kanika 25 Nov 2015 | PNS | in Bhubaneswar
- FPI pays rich tributes to ex-CM Choudhury 25 Nov 2015 | PNS | in Bhubaneswar
- Nuke-capable Dhanush missle test-fired 25 Nov 2015 | PNS | in Bhubaneswar
- ICAR holds talks on farm sector growth 25 Nov 2015 | PNS | in Bhubaneswar
- Himachal gets Best Inland Fisherman-Reservoir Award 25 Nov 2015 | PNS | in Chandigarh
- Smart City Bhubaneswar needs to be safe for women 25 Nov 2015 | MAYARANI PRAHARAJ | in Bhubaneswar
- Climate change panel okays three projects in Haryana 25 Nov 2015 | PNS | in Chandigarh
- B’pur Manch observes Nabakrushna birthday 25 Nov 2015 | PNS | in Bhubaneswar
22 Nov 2015 | Gautam Chintamani
Most films exist in a specific universe and while some filmmakers manage to create unique worlds with their cinema, very few like Sooraj Barjatya are able to craft a cosmos that can be both real and illusory. Intriguingly enough, since the late 1980s to now, the one factor that has come to define the realm of Barjatya's cinematic universe is an actor who would ideally appear to be a misfit...
What Aamir Khan, one of the most respected actors, said in the presence of many senior BJP people, is what the whole world is saying.
There’s no support currently for a large US-led Western Army to attempt to conquer and hold ISIL-controlled areas.
Our Constitution guarantees freedom of expression and Aamir Khan, like any citizen, is entitled to his personal opinion.