- State Editions
- A YEAR OF FEATS
- Cover Story
- 150th Anniversary Issue
- Middle India
- Literary Issue Special
- Cinema Issue Special
- Women's Special Issue
- Foreign Policy Special Issue
- for a cause
Kejri, AAP back to street politics with arrest drama
Very rarely the courts in India have stood witness to political stunts of this nature as the one unfolded at Patiala House Courts on Wednesday where Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) convener Arvind Kejriwal refused to follow the judicial procedure and invited two-day jail. True to the party’s character, scores of AAP leaders and workers resorted to a protest outside Tihar Jail as soon as Kejriwal was arrested forcing the police to impose Section 144 in the area.
Following his arrest, over 200 AAP supporters gathered outside the Tihar Jail forcing the police use mild force to evacuate them. The situation turned chaotic after his party workers clashed with police there in the evening. Senior AAP leaders Manish Sisodia, Sanjay Singh, Yogendra Yadav, Rakhi Birla, Jarnail Singh and others joined their supporters to denounce the police act and went on to question the rationale of court’s order.
Meanwhile, around 50 protesters — including Sisodia, Singh, Yadav, Birla and Jarnail Singh — were detained by the West district police. “The protesters were detained under Sections 347 (constraint to illegal act), 348 (wrongful confinement to extort confession), 349 (use of force if another causes motion), 186 (obstructing public servant), 332 (voluntarily causing hurt) and 352 (punishment for assault) of the IPC. They will be produced before court on Thursday,” said a senior police official.
The AAP protest on Tilak Nagar to Delhi Cantt road on both the carriageways resulted in traffic snarls as the space was blocked. As the reports of traffic jam spread, Delhi Police sent reinforcement to evacuate the protesters.
Earlier in the day, Kejriwal was arrested and sent to Tihar Jail till May 23 by the court after he refused to furnish bail bond in a criminal defamation complaint filed against him by BJP leader Nitin Gadkari. “Take him into custody,” Metropolitan Magistrate Gomati Manocha ordered after the AAP leader repeatedly refused to furnish a personal bail bond of Rs 10,000 and a surety of like amount. Furious over his repeated refusals, the court ordered his arrest as it turned down Kejriwal’s oral submissions and assurances, which is considered unknown to the law. The court, in its order, noted that this was not a case where the accused is unable to furnish bail bond due to financial inability.
“The accused is just adamant to not furnish bail bond or even a personal bond for his appearance before the court,” it said. Kejriwal was summoned as an accused by the court in the defamation complaint in which Gadkari had alleged that he was defamed by the AAP leader, who had included his name in the party’s list of “India’s most corrupt”. After the court pronounced its order, Kejriwal was taken into lock up inside the court premises amid tight security and later taken to Tihar Jail.
The magistrate, in her three-page order, also observed that the procedure of courts cannot be “thrown to the winds” at the whims and fancies of the litigants. “The court cannot act as a mute spectator when a particular litigant intentionally seeks to violate the procedure established by law. This case cannot be dealt with any differently than any other criminal cases where the courts insist on furnishing bail bond/personal bond to secure the presence of the accused persons. The accused in the present case cannot seek differential treatment to be let off only on an oral undertaking in violation/divergence to the settled practice/procedure regarding bail,” the court said.
During the argument, the court asked if the AAP leader was looking for “some exceptional treatment”. The magistrate observed, “I completely agree but why he (Kejriwal) will not furnish bail bond. What is the problem? There is a procedure and why should we follow different procedure in this case. I agree he will appear in the court but the procedure is that a person has to file bail bond. Are you looking for some exceptional treatment?”
To this, Kejriwal argued that he has not committed any heinous crime and added that he was not looking for any exceptional treatment. “This is my principle that when I have not done anything wrong, I will not seek bail. I am ready to go to jail,” he said. Advocates Prashant Bhushan and Rahul Mehra, who appeared for Kejriwal, told the magistrate that these cases are of political nature and as per the principle of AAP, they will not furnish bail bond.
Senior advocate Pinki Anand, who appeared for Gadkari, opposed the contentions of defence counsel, saying there was no procedure in law to furnish undertaking and law should not vary for anyone. During the day’s proceedings, the court also allowed the application of Gadkari’s counsel seeking exemption from personal appearance for today on behalf of the BJP leader.
MORE Today's Newspaper NEWS
- Elder doctors to boost healthcare 28 May 2016 | Pioneer News Service
- Jawan kills three intruders, martyred in J&K combat 28 May 2016 | Khursheed Wani
- Committed to make NE gateway to SE Asia: PM 28 May 2016 | Anup Sharma
- Federal Front hopes rise with Didi’s surge 28 May 2016 | Saugar Sengupta
- Cabinet reshuffle soon: Amit Shah 28 May 2016 | PNS
- BrahMos hits the bull’s-eye 28 May 2016 | PNS
- Not a single taint on Govt in 2 years: PM 27 May 2016 | PNS
- Worries on hold, envoys attend Africa Day 27 May 2016 | PNS
- Modi’s moments elicit 3.4 cr Facebook likes! 27 May 2016 | PNS
- Doctors strike over pay, one dies for want of medical aid 27 May 2016 | Priyanka Sharma
27 May 2016 | Ananya Borgohain
Revolving around human trafficking, Partho Sen-Gupta’s psychological thriller Sunrise investigates what has perpetually degraded humankind, writes Ananya Borgohain The NGO CRY (Child Rights and You) estimated that on an average in India, around 180 children go missing every day. Referring to data assembled by the Union Home Ministry, the NGO stated that the total number of untraced children in 2015 was 62,988 as against 34,244 in 2013...
28 May 2016 | PNS | BRAHMAPUR
Brahmapur denizens’ longstanding hope for a ring road seems to have faded even though the Brahmapur Development Authority (BDA) has a proposal in this regard. It was so conceived from the fact that Housing and Urban Development Minister Puspendra Singhdeo, who reviewed various ongoing developmental projects in the city on Thursday, didn’t touch ring road proposal file presented by the BDA...
We will present our case for Jat reservation before the court and make all possible efforts to get the stay on the quota vacated.
We carried out a strike against a Taliban leader. We will continue to do whatever needed to protect our forces.
I'd love to debate Bernie (Sanders) on television. It would get very high ratings. It would be in a big arena.