×
E-PAPER ▾

E-paper

State Editions

There was no conflict between Civil Courts and Darul-Qaza : AIMPLB Secretary

| | Lucknow | in Lucknow

A day after All India Muslim Personal Law Board(AIMPLB) proposed to open Darul-Qaza (Shariat courts) in all districts of the country to resolves issues like marriage, divorce and inheritance in line with Islamic law, Secretary of AIMPLB, Zafaryab Jilani said that it was a 100% constitutional exercise and that there was no conflict between Civil Courts and Darul-Qaza.

“Media has caused confusion by dubbing Darul Qaza as court. It’s not a court as it is headed by a Qazi.  Darul Qaza will perform the role of mediation and arbitration which is permissible under Indian Arbitration Act and its order will not be binding on litigants. If they are not satisfied then they could approach Civil courts,” said Jilani.   

“No one calls it Shariat court anymore but Darul Qaza, where Qazi solves civil disputes or suggests ways for separations if issues aren’t solved,’’ he explained.

When asked as to why he wanted different court for Muslims even though the country had Supreme Court, Jilani said, “ This is not a court. We call it Darul-Qaza where a Qazi sits and listens to people’s disputes. Both parties approach him and he tests them about Shariyat. He tries to resolve their issue and if they agree they do not approach Civil Court. There is no conflict between Civil Courts and Darul-Qaza.”

“This matter was challenged in Supreme Court (Vishwa Lochan Madan case) where a plea was raised that this was a parallel judicial system. We have the right to practice our religion,” he said.

While the final decision on AIMPLB’s proposal will be taken after a meeting in New Delhi on July 15, the draft proposal itself has caused a political storm and invited pan-India outrage. Critics of Shariat court alleged that formalizing pan-India Shariah courts will not only encourage parallel system of justice in India but will also endorse unhealthy precedent of mainstreaming religion-based justice systems in secular India. The criticism of AIMPLB’s proposal is rooted in the fact that it attempts to not only colour justice with religion but also mocks the sanctity of constitutionally-appointed courts.

Earlier on Sunday,  Zafaryab Jilani put on record that there were 40 Shariat courts in Uttar Pradesh and the Board was planning to open one such court in every district of India.

BJP spokesperson Meenakshi Lekhi slammed the AIMPLB for planning to open Sharia courts. “You can discuss religious matters but court binds this nation. There is no place for Shariat court, be it district or village or city. Courts will work in accordance with law. This isn’t Islamic Republic of India,” she said

 
 
 
 
 

E-paper


TOP STORIES


Sunday Edition

Page generated in 0.4241 seconds.