France has shown courage by recognising Palestine. Others must follow — not to weaken Israel but to save both Israelis and Palestinians from endless war
Though it may not have any direct effect on Israel or its ongoing Gaza offensive, France’s recognition of the Palestinian state is a step in the right direction which may inspire other nations to take a stand and show spine. It was declared earlier but is official now. France’s formal recognition of a Palestinian state at the United Nations marks a historic moment in the long, painful saga of the West Asia conflict. President Emmanuel Macron’s declaration that “the time for peace has come” is more than symbolic — it is a demand for the international community to acknowledge the human catastrophe unfolding in Gaza and the political stalemate that has denied Palestinians their right to statehood for decades. By joining a growing list of nations —including the UK, Canada, Australia, and Portugal — that have extended recognition, France has challenged the inertia that has long defined world’s approach to Palestine.
Predictably, Israel has rejected the move, branding it a “reward” for Hamas’s October 7 attack. But that is a hollow argument, given that Gaza residents are on the verge of extinction, facing the daily challenge of survival and starving for basics as Israel rains missiles on the hapless people. Recognition strengthens the Palestinian Authority and legitimate voices seeking peace, while isolating extremist actors on all sides. The implications of France’s step are profound. First, it creates momentum for a wider shift in global opinion. As Belgium, Luxembourg, Malta, and others prepare to follow suit, Israel finds itself increasingly isolated in the world arena. Isolation could push Israel towards the only viable path: a two-state solution where both peoples coexist in peace.
Second, recognition reframes the narrative. Macron’s decision, amplified by UN Secretary-General António Guterres’s warning that Gaza’s situation is “morally, legally and politically intolerable,” places it back at the centre of international conscience. The European Union’s plans for reconstruction funds underscore that recognition must be followed by material support, not just rhetoric.
Now the big question is: where does India stand on this crucial juncture? Historically, India was among the earliest champions of Palestinian self-determination, yet in recent decades its position has tilted closer to Israel, largely for strategic and economic reasons. But silence or neutrality at this juncture will be detrimental to its world image as a champion of human rights and a voice for the Global South.
India should reaffirm its support for a two-state solution, extend recognition to Palestine, and call for an immediate ceasefire. By doing so, it would not only stand on the right side of history but also align itself with the values of justice, dignity, and non-violence. India’s voice carries weight; using it now would demonstrate that its pursuit of global power does not come at the expense of principle.
