Tata Sons moves SC against NCLAT order on Cyrus Mistry

| | New Delhi
  • 0

Tata Sons moves SC against NCLAT order on Cyrus Mistry

Friday, 03 January 2020 | IANS | New Delhi

Tata Sons on Thursday moved the Supreme Court challenging reinstatement of Cyrus Mistry as executive Chairman and director of Tata Sons and the three group companies — Tata Consultancy Services Ltd (TCS), Tata Industries Ltd and Tata Teleservices (Maharashtra) Ltd.

The company has challenged the complete order of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), pronounced on December 18, restoring Mistry as executive Chairman and also his immediate reinstatement as director of Tata Sons and three group companies.

The petition seeks a stay on the NCLAT order in the wake of the TCS Board Meeting slated for January 9.

It is learnt that the board meeting is likely to consider the third quarter earnings and a discussion on the reinstatement of Mistry as a director. The petitioner will urge the apex court to list the matter for urgent hearing after the court reopens after vacations on January 6.

The NCLAT while reinstating ousted chairman Cyrus Mistry, held that the appointment of N Chandrasekaran as his successor is illegal. The appeals court observed the haste in Mistry’s removal as chairman of the Tata group’s holding company, and this action completely ignored the interest and oppression of minority shareholders.

However, the appellate tribunal has granted the Tata Group four weeks to file an appeal against its judgement. The restoration order will only be operational after this time period.

Aryama Sundaram, counsel for Mistry, had told IANS, “NCLT appeared to have gone with the Tata name and the majoritarian view in its earlier judgment. This goes against the grain of Company Law and Companies Act. If one follows the earlier path, then you don’t need provisions in law which safeguards minority shareholders’ rights. “This was an erroneous approach. What we did as counsel was that we contested this template. It wasn’t the individual right of Mr Mistry, which was being trampled, it was the oppression and mismanagement of the board that was in question and this directly impacted varied shareholders including millions of public shareholders.”

State Editions

Lovely resignation brings Congress factional feud into open

29 April 2024 | Saumya Shukla | Delhi

Congress alliance with AAP for political reasons: BJP

29 April 2024 | Saumya Shukla/Samar Pandey | Delhi

Vote to save democracy, Sunita exhorts Delhiites

29 April 2024 | Staff Reporter | Delhi

AAP youth wing organises walkathon Walk for Kejriwal

29 April 2024 | Staff Reporter | Delhi

Nomination process for LS seats to begin from today

29 April 2024 | Staff Reporter | Delhi

Sunday Edition

Chronicle of Bihar, beyond elections

28 April 2024 | Deepak Kumar Jha | Agenda

One Nation, One Election Federalism at risk or Unity Fortified?

28 April 2024 | PRIYOTOSH SHARMA and CHANDRIMA DUTTA | Agenda

Education a must for the Panchayati Raj System to flourish

28 April 2024 | Vikash Kumar | Agenda

‘Oops I Dropped The Lemon Trat’

28 April 2024 | Gyaneshwar Dayal | Agenda

Standing Alone, and How

28 April 2024 | Pawan Soni | Agenda