The Supreme Court on Friday asked former Congress MLA from Haryana, Dharam Singh Chhoker, to surrender back to jail on July 12 in connection with an alleged multi-crore rupees money laundering case as it refused to entertain his plea against an order of the Punjab and Haryana High Court.
A partial working day bench comprising Justices Rajesh Bindal and R Mahadevan referred to certain factual mistakes in the submissions advanced by a senior lawyer on Thursday during the hearing and said a “drama is being played”.
“We have to say one thing, yesterday a mis-statement was made by a senior counsel. Sorry to point it out. What he said was that he (Chhoker) was admitted on June 30, 2025 in the hospital. His surgery was planned, and on July 2, his surgery was conducted, and he is still in hospital. Now, the documents placed on record show that he is out of the hospital and discharged on July 5. This is good enough to dismiss this,” the bench said.
“This is a clear attempt to mislead the court and abuse the process of law,” the bench said.
It said usually, the court is considerate in granting relief on medical grounds.
“Seeing the conduct, we will not consider,” the bench said and asked the former MLA to surrender by 5 PM on July 12.
Chhoker, who is an accused in a staggering `600 crore money laundering scam affecting nearly 3,700 homebuyers, was arrested by Enforcement Directorate officials on May 4 from a five-star hotel in New Delhi. Chhoker claimed he was subjected to physical assault during the arrest.
The Punjab and Haryana High Court granted Chhoker interim bail on medical grounds on June 19, permitting him to undergo surgery at a hospital of his choice.
However, the court explicitly stated that the bail was a “one-time measure” and ordered him to surrender before jail authorities by 5 PM on July 12.
The top court was urged by senior lawyer Ashok Aggarwal and advocate Ashish Pandey that the high court erred by not extending the time to surrender for the old leader who was assaulted during the arrest.
They also assailed the high court order which said that the interim bail on medical grounds was a “one time measure”.
“The petitioner, a senior citizen and political adversary of the ruling dispensation in the state of Haryana, has been arrested by the Enforcement Directorate in complete violation of the mandate of Article 21 of the Constitution, without following due process of law,” Pandey said.
The plea said the high court, while granting the interim bail on medical grounds on June 19, recorded that Chokker received injuries including a fractured hand during the arrest.
“His case fell within the exception under the first proviso to Section 45(1) of the PMLA (being ‘sick or infirm’), there was no justification in limiting the grant of interim bail till July 12, and imposing an arbitrary embargo that it be treated as a “one-time measure”. Such a condition is ex-facie unreasonable and constitutionally impermissible,” Aggarwal said.
Chhoker, in his plea, said the high court’s rigid limitation on bail duration contradicts its own observations regarding the seriousness of his medical condition and the illegality surrounding his arrest.
The plea further said that the high court’s order effectively denies him adequate opportunity to challenge the legality of his arrest and subsequent remand.
It also assailed the high court’s decision on July 3 to defer the hearing of his main writ petition challenging his arrest until after his surrender.
Chhoker had initially approached the Supreme Court in May seeking relief, but was advised to move the high court.
